Skip to content

Philips SHN7500 Noise Cancelling Earbuds

Bose QC2I’ve never been a big fan of earbuds. Maybe it’s the residual effect of my mother’s admonition, when I was a child, to never insert anything other than my elbow into my ear. (Go ahead, try it. In your ear, I mean.) Or maybe it’s just that most earbuds have, over the years, proved to be seriously uncomfortable after more than 15 minutes of listening. This was true not only with off-the-shelf models, but with a set I had made from molds of my ear canals. This was never a big deal, though, given the ready availability of all sorts of non-earbud alternatives. But I’m nothing if not flexible, so when the opportunity arose to try a couple of new sets, described by their respective manufacturers as being “different, and really comfortable,” I leapt at the chance.

Being a very big fan of noise cancellation technology I first turned my attention to Philips’ $99.99 SHN7500. From a comfort standpoint, three things set these apart from the majority of earbuds. The first is a shape that keeps each bud in place without relying on it being jammed so far into your ear that it bruises your brain. The second is the three sets of “ear caps” that let you tailor the size of each earbud’s business end to fit your ear. The third is the lanyard holding the small electronics module, which goes around your neck like a high-tech Polynesian-style tiki amulet. The earbuds’ cables are routed through the lanyard, with a short run to the ears. This eliminates the tangle of wires that normally try to pull the buds out of your ears and otherwise provide an annoying distraction. I am not a runner, or any other kind of athlete, but those of you are pursue such activities will appreciate the convenience of Philips’ design.

The SHN7500 can be used as a stand-alone oasis, solely for the purpose of providing a little peace and quiet; or it can be attached–using a supplied signal cable–to an iPod or other device for music. (Philips supplies airplane and quarter-inch adapters as well, along with a compact carrying case that has room for the earbuds, accessories, and an iPod.) In stand-alone mode, the SHN7500′s noise cancellation strategy calls for a combination of the active circuitry and the physical isolation afforded by a good fit in the ear. My own impression, in this mode, is that they could have ramped up the active circuitry just a bit, and extended its reach both up and down. But while less effective than the gold standard, the SHN7500 is a third the price, and is better than anything else I’ve sampled in its price range.

Unlike some noise-cancelling models, the SHN7500 can play music whether or not the active circuitry is engaged. This means, for one thing, that if you forget to install a fresh battery on that 14-hour flight, and the NC circuitry stops working, you can still listen to tunes. It also means that when outside noise isn’t a factor you can listen to unprocessed music. Either way, though, the audio quality of the SHN7500 is quite good. There’s plenty of bass, and the highs are crisp without the nasty zing that can be so fatiguing. Big, complex music doesn’t sound mushy, while simpler stuff is presented with admirable clarity. In all, Philips has hit the sweet spot with the SHN7500.

Witmer Peanut Butter Mixer

Peanut Butter MixerGrowing up in a Skippy household, I naturally cast a jaundiced eye on those weirdo moms who foisted Jif on their benighted offspring. Thus imprinted, I remained a Skippy loyalist for many years. Despite the grocery store’s ever-widening peanut butter shelf, I felt no urge to experiment. For me, Skippy was the One True Peanut Butter.

Then I got involved in a mixed marriage: my jar of Skippy now shared shelf space with her jar of (gasp) Smucker’s Natural peanut butter. Being the accommodating sort, I tried a PBJ sandwich made with her stuff, and truth to tell it wasn’t bad. In fact, I liked it a lot. The absence of salt and sugar in the ingredients list made for a fresher, if less potent, taste.

Unfortunately, also absent from that list were the stabilizers that give Skippy its uniform consistency. As a result, upon opening a jar of Smucker’s Natural Chunky you’re presented with two distinct layers. At the top is a layer of peanut chunks, suspended in a deep pool of peanut oil. Below this is the peanut butter itself, which, having lost its oil, is thick and relatively dry.

The goal, upon opening a fresh jar, is to mix the layers without making a huge mess. I just stick a spoon into the jar, hauling the solids up to the top and allowing the chunks and oil to fall into the resulting gap. The process takes a couple or three minutes and, naturally, some oil, falls down the side of the jar. Some peanut chunks, too, most of the time. But I’ve only used one utensil, so clean-up is relatively simple. My wife, bless her soul, empties the jar into a bowl, using a rubber spatula to get every last drop. After mixing the stuff with a potato masher, she coaxes it back into the jar. In the end, there’s a good-sized mess, and lots of tools to clean.

Not any more. For the low low price of twelve bucks (postpaid) we now mix our peanut butter using R.N. Witmer Company’s Natural Peanut Butter Hand Mixer. It consists of a (temporary) replacement lid with a crank on the outside, and a stirrer on the inside. A few turns of the crank, and the peanut butter is ready to go. When the device is removed from the jar, a gasket under the lid cleans the mixing rod. The Mixer comes in six sizes, including one for those giant 36-ounce jars. If this gizmo was a dot-com, Mr. Witmer (if there is such a person), would be selling the company to Google for a few billion bucks right now.

Satellite Navigation 1: Background

There are travelers whose journeys can be described by this T-short slogan: “The Ride is the Destination.” If that shirt is, or could be, part of your wardrobe, you could be among the lucky few travelers who are never lost. For most of us, though, more often than not it’s the destination that is the destination.

More likely though, is that you spend your road time trying to get from Point A to Point B. Along the way, the goal is to avoid arriving at Point X. Let’s define Point X as any place that prompts the phrase “where on earth are we?” The circumstances leading to the arrival at Point X are often the subject of heated arguments, where sentences like “I thought you were watching for the turn-off!” and “Are you happy now, mister ‘I don’t need to stop for directions’?” are mixed with expletives that, if they appeared here, might cause entire nations to lose access to the site.

Avoiding those unpleasant scenarios requires that you know only two things: where you are, and how to get from there to where you want to be. A driver who is lost, but has a proper map, isn’t totally at sea. He can acquire those two essential facts by first driving in one direction or another until he arrives at a place big enough to appear on the map. Then, it’s just a question of locating that place on the map (which establishes a new Point A), locating the place he eventually wants to get to (good old Point B), and determining what roads can be used to get from one to the other. Granted, the drive from Point X to the new Point A might have taken our frustrated traveler many miles in the wrong direction, but it was unavoidable. Until the location of Point A had been determined, there was no way to know how to get to Point B.

Let’s look back, for a moment, to 1957, which was the year the Russians placed Sputnik, the first artificial satellite, into orbit. Once it was determined that such a thing was possible, it was only a matter of time before the globe was circled by dozens, nay, hundreds of man-made moons. Some of them perform tasks whose purposes are very hush-hush, others do nothing more sinister than blanket the world in Oprah’s warming embrace. And 24 of them provide us with the means to pinpoint our location anywhere in the world. Those 24 satellites–21 primaries, and 3 spares–make up the Global Positioning System, or GPS. A $13 billion U.S. government project that was originally intended for the military, GPS is available for the use of anyone who cares to spend a few dollars for the required hardware. The satellites are arrayed in such a way as to keep at least four visible to the receiver at any given time.

With the information received from any three of those satellites, a GPS navigation system can pinpoint its own latitude and longitude anywhere on earth. It then places that information within the context of a highly detailed onboard electronic road map (thus eliminating Point X from the equation) and calculates the best route from Point A to Point B. Your only job is to tell the system what Point B–the destination–is.

Typically, a GPS device will display a road map, with an icon indicating the position of the car. As you drive, the map scrolls to keep the car roughly centered. If you’ve entered a destination, the device will provide a visual, and usually audible, warning in plenty of time for you to make the appropriate turn. In higher-end units the voice prompt will tell you the name of the street on which you’re to turn. More basic models simply say “turn right in 300 feet,” while providing more specific information on the screen. If you haven’t selected a destination, the display will still show the position of the car on a moving map.

GPS is available in several forms:

  • Factory-installed, in the car’s dashboard or console.
  • As a portable, self-contained device that mounts to the windshield or dash top.
  • As an antenna and software for a laptop, Pocket PC, or PDA.
  • As a service that runs on a cell phone.

The next installment of Satellite Navigation will discuss the pros and cons of each format.

Hands-Free Cell Phone Kits

As anyone who’s spent time there knows all too well, the use of a cell phone while walking in midtown Manhattan is now mandatory. Or maybe not; but a casual observer could easily to make that inference. Ironically–and this part is true–it is illegal to use that same phone while driving a car on those same streets, at least when the phone is held in one hand, as it’s designed to be used. New York was the first state to outlaw hand-held cell phone use while driving, and it looks as though much of the rest of the country will follow that lead. Needless to say, this has been a windfall for manufacturers of hands-free kits.

You’ve probably seen such kits advertised on late-night TV, for 20 or 30 bucks. Maybe you’ve bought one. If not, don’t bother. Based on a random sampling of several kits in that price range, I can say with some certainty that they are uniformly awful. Using one will allow you to keep both hands on the wheel, but won’t be of much use if you want to carry on a conversation that isn’t punctuated by both of you saying “what?” every few seconds. Fortunately, excellent alternatives are available. I’m going to discuss three of them: a wired car kit, a Bluetooth car kit/speakerphone, and a Bluetooth earpiece.

Unwired UC-500

In stark contrast to the typical lighter-socket assemblage, Unwired Technology’s $119.95 UC-500 Handsfree Kit is a stand-alone device that attaches to the vehicle’s headrest support. If the headrest is supported by a pair of tubes, the UC-500 snaps right into place. Other headrest configurations require some–but not much–ingenuity for installation. Once in place, the UC-500 positions a speaker to the driver’s left, and a microphone on the right. The microphone is mounted on a 16-inch gooseneck boom, allowing it to be positioned to the side of the driver’s head, out of the line of sight. A six-foot cord, with a standard 2.5mm plug, connects the UC-500 with most phones. (The unit comes with adapters for other phone types.) Power is provided by three AAA batteries that, thanks to auto on/off circuitry, are good for six months of normal use.

I plugged the UC-500 into an old non-Bluetooth Motorola v60 which, despite its age, supports voice-activated dialing, and made several test calls. The speaker sounded fine; it was, in fact, better than the one in the v60. However, the true test of a hands-free kit is how it sounds to the other party, and in this respect the UC-500 delivered stellar performance. Not one of our guinea pigs was aware that a hands-free kit was being used. In fact, the quality was so high that only a few could tell we were on a cell phone. Credit for this performance is due to mic/speaker isolation circuitry that eliminates feedback, and to a proprietary ambient noise reduction system. Normal conversation was possible even with windows open and the radio playing. In fact, the noise reduction system is effective enough to allow the UC-500 to be used in an open convertible.

While considerably more expensive than run-of-the-mill hands-free kits, the UC-500 is worth every penny of its price. It represents a quantum leap in performance and convenience over lesser devices.

Motorola HF820

If your phone is equipped with Bluetooth, and you don’t want to bother with a wire in the car, Motorola’s HF820 (recently discontinued but still readily available, and at a whopping discount off the $99.99 list) easily meets and exceeds The Grown-Up’s Guide’s performance and usability benchmarks. The HF820 can serve not only as a hands-free car kit but a desktop speakerphone for small-group conference calls. Motorola includes a lanyard with the HF820, so you can also wear it as a necklace, carry on hands-free conversations as you walk down the street, and look like a crazy person. (If you want to look like a crazy person who doesn’t wear a necklace, clip the HF820 to your belt. You’ll have to raise your voice a bit to be heard, which will only enhance the effect.)

The HF820′s pairing procedure is simple and quick. With the unit already on, you press and hold the volume/power button. Pairing mode is indicated by two beeps and a steadily lit LED, at which point you make the connection using the phone’s menu. The HF820 can store pairing data for up to eight phones, any of which can initiate a connection.

Motorola spread the HF820′s controls out across the chassis, so you’ll only hit the intended button. The power control is also the volume toggle, but switching the unit off requires that you hold the button in for a few seconds, so there’s no danger of doing so while adjusting the volume. The central multifunction button is used to initiate, answer, and end calls. If your phone supports enhanced functions like hold and three-way calling, the same button invokes them as well. The mute button is fitted with an LED reminder, and a 2.5mm jack accepts a wired headset for privacy.

When I initiated calls using the phone’s keypad, the HF820 performed like a champ, and the speaker delivered crisp, clean sound. My fellow conversationalists could tell that we weren’t on a “normal” phone, but didn’t complain about it. I did, however, have some intermittent trouble getting the Motorola E815 phone to recognize voice commands. In some cases, the phone would ask for confirmation (i.e., “did you say call so-and-so?) and when I said “No!” it took it for yes and made the call. A second sample didn’t exhibit this behavior, so I’ll chalk it up to a defective unit that somehow made it into the field. If yours has that problem, return it for another, and life will be good.

Motorola HS850

Truth be told, for personal use I’ve abandoned both the UC-500 and HF820, and now rely exclusively on a Bluetooth headset to keep me from running afoul of the law. After trying six highly-touted models, from as many manufacturers, I settled on Motorola’s HS850. The main reason I chose the HS850 is that I don’t like to stick things in my ear. Unlike most of the headsets I tried, the HS850′s speaker rests gently outside the ear canal, held in place by a rubbery loop that can be deployed for left- or right-ear use. Now, I don’t wear the HS850 unless I’m engaged in a conversation, but it’s comfy enough that I could do so without complaining. (And for all I know, you want to wear a Bluetooth headset every waking hour, just in case. This one, you could.)

Of course, while comfort is an important criterion when choosing a headset, it means little if the unit’s performance and usage-related ergonomics don’t measure up. From a performance standpoint, the HS850 is completely transparent. By this I mean simply that the sound quality (at both ends) is the same as that of the phone itself, and what more could you want? The headsets usability is stellar, especially as compared with some of the more fiddly alternatives. The microphone is on a hinged “boom” that’s shown in the deployed position in the photo. Flipping it into that position turns on the power and initiates a connection with the associated phone. (My phone is set to accept the connection automatically, so when a call comes in all I have to do is flip the HS850 into working mode, slip it on, and begin the conversation.) A single multi-function button controls call start and end, redial, hold, mute, and three-way calling, while a pair of smaller buttons raise and lower the speaker volume.

The HS850 is priced a fat one cent under a C-note, but you should be able to buy it for around forty bucks. If size is an issue, for the same list price you can also opt for the newer H700, which is roughly 30 percent smaller and comes in several colors. Being newer, it probably isn’t discounted as heavily.

Bose QuietComfort2 Noise-Cancelling Headphones

Bose QC2What sets the $299 Bose QuietComfort2 Noise-Cancelling Headphones apart from the herd is revealed in their long name. Noise-cancelling technology is, in theory, very simple. Here’s how it works: Ambient sound is captured by a built-in microphone, and the audio equivalent of a mirror image of that sound is amplified and played back through the headset, either along with music or by itself. In either case, the mirror image cancels out the ambient noise, or at least reduce it to a significant degree. It’s especially effective in eliminating the enervating low-frequency drone that’s somehow part-and-parcel of air, train, and bus travel.

What sets these headphones apart from the rest of the noise-cancelling headphones I’ve tried — which is plenty — is revealed by the “Comfort” part of the model designation. Noise-cancellation technology means very little if it feels like your brain has been pierced on both sides after you’ve been wearing the headset for half an hour. The QuietComfort2′s soft cushions surround the ears without pressing on them, eliminating the “my head’s in a vice” effect delivered by much of the competition.

You can use the QuietComfort2 in stand-alone mode, creating a peaceful environment when you’re surrounded by chaos. Or you can plug in the supplied signal cable and listen to your iPod. In music mode the QuietComfort2 delivers first-class sound, the quality of which is enhanced by the effect of the still-working noise cancellation circuit system.

You can buy cheaper — lots cheaper — noise-cancelling headphones, but I daresay you won’t find any that deliver nearly as good a mix of sound and comfort.

Universal Remote Controls

Universal RemoteOK, so you’re ready to settle in and watch a DVD on the home theater. The first step, of course, is to hunt down all of the necessary remotes, including the one that somehow wound up under the couch. Once all of the remotes are gathered, you use one remote to turn on the TV and select the appropriate input; another to switch on the receiver, tell it to expect a call from the DVD player, and how to respond to that call; and a third to operate the DVD player itself.

In the back of your mind, you know that this is silly, because each one of those remotes was touted as being “universal” in its ability to control not only the gadget it came with, but the rest of your stuff as well. Strictly speaking, that claim is true, but making it happen is a complex, time-consuming, and ultimately frustrating ordeal. In the end, the result of each remote’s universal potential is nothing more than an excess of tiny, poorly-labeled, and mostly identical buttons.

In the end, you’re left juggling two, three, or even more remotes, each of which plays its own small role in the completion of the overall task, which (remember?) is setting the system up to play a DVD. In an ideal world, you’d pick up just one remote, and push just one button. That button, conveniently labeled “watch DVD,” would turn on all of the components, set their controls for DVD viewing, and leave you with just one more job: placing the disc in the player.

That ideal exists, in the form of programmable activity-oriented remote controls. For the purpose of this exercise, we’re going to look at Logitech’s Harmony H688. Sporting a big, bright LCD display panel and backlit color-coded buttons, the H688 comes as near as matters to being able to program itself, and is dead simple to use. That’s because all of the programming is done via the internet, with the H688 connected to your computer via the USB port. (Set-up is a one-time process, so if you don’t have an internet connection you can bring the remote to a friend’s house, and set it up there.)

Here’s how it works. Using the supplied cable, you connect the H688 to the PC, run the CD-based installation routine, and wait for the setup program to connect to Logitech’s Harmony Web site. Once you’re on line, configuration wizards take over, and ask for the make and model of each component to be controlled. You select the make of each component from an astonishingly complete list, and then enter the model numbers manually in the next screen.

You could stop there, and just use the H688 to operate each device manually, but a better idea is to move on to the Activity section. There you can set up sequences of commands that automate all of the multi-component operations connected with viewing a tape or DVD, listening to CDs or radio, or just about anything you can envision. Once you’ve defined the devices set up the Activities (which involves little more than answering a bunch of easy questions) the necessary commands and macros are sent to the H688′s memory via the USB connection.

Once the H688 is disconnected from the PC, and in your hand in the media room, the Activities are controlled by five color-coded buttons. Four are labeled with common tasks, while the fifth, marked “more” moves the selection process to the display where additional Activities can be selected. The only drawback to Activities is that they start with the assumption that all relevant components are switched off. Any that happen to be on when you press the button will then be turned off by the command. Fortunately, the H688 has an easy solution to that problem. The Help button brings up a series of screens that say things like “Is the Television off?” Answer those questions, and before long everything gets sorted out.

You can also use the H688 to operate each component individually. The device has a full complement of well-marked buttons for basic functions (volume, channel, play/pause and other transport commands, etc.) and some that are not so basic. The latter include buttons for accessing the channel guide screen associated with Tivo and other DVRs, digital cable boxes, and satellite boxes. In addition, the remote’s “Device” button brings a scrollable list of additional commands to the display, where each can be invoked by a nearby button. The three-line screen displays four of these “soft” commands at a time, with the top line showing the name of the component being controlled. You can also opt for a six-command display, with the component reminder disappearing from the top line after an initial confirmation appearance.

What to Look For
Easy programming
Big, comfortable buttons
Legible control labelling
Compatibility with all necessary components

Corkscrews

Basic Corkscrew Although wine in boxes and screw-top bottles can be very good indeed, you might occasionally find yourself in a situation that calls for a corkscrew. The simplest of these devices consists of a helix-shaped length of metal — the screw — with a point at one end and a handle at the other.The idea is to screw the pointy end into the cork, hold the bottle in one hand, or perhaps under the arm, and yank the cork out with the other. If the cork is in good shape (i.e., doesn’t crumble) it comes out of the bottle with a satisfying “pop” and everyone applauds your feat of strength. But for the purposes of this discussion, the condition of the cork is irrelevant. It’s your shape that inspires me to include the corkscrew’s relatively simple technology in The Grown-Up’s Guide.

You see, pulling a cork straight out of its bottle requires more strength than you might think. Or maybe not: If you’ve tried to use a simple corkscrew lately, you probably know exactly how much strength it takes, and might even be nursing a slightly pulled shoulder muscle. The solution, as we all learned in Junior High, is leverage, which allows us achieve the necessary force without undue exertion.

In the corkscrew arena there are several ways to gain leverage, but the goal is to find one that doesn’t require the substitution of skill for strength. In other words, a corkscrew that gets the job done without the need for muscle or lots of practice.

Waiter CorkscrewThe most common leverage-based corkscrew is known as the “waiter’s” model. In theory, it’s simple: screw it into the cork, place the bottle rest on the rim, and lift the long end. If you’ve got the screw properly centered, and the cork isn’t too long, the first lift will bring it nearly all the way out of the bottle. At that point, relatively little personal force will be needed to finish the job. Centering the corkscrew is important, both to keep from damaging the cork and to assure good contact between the bottle rest and the rim. Aside from this need to center the screw, one major usability issue keeps the waiter’s model from being an ideal corkscrew. As you lift the lever to remove the cork, the force you’re exerting begins to transfer from upwards to sideways, pushing the cork against the inside of the bottle’s neck. Depending on the length and condition of the cork, you could wind up with half a cork stuck at the bottom of the neck. It’s best, I think, to leave the waiter’s corkscrew in the hands of actual waiters.

Double Lever CorkscrewProbably the most common easy-to-use household corkscrew is the double lever type. It uses a gear and rack system that raises a pair of levers — sometimes called wings — as you turn the knob that inserts the screw into the cork. A side benefit of the basic design is that the screw is automatically centered in the cork. When the screw is fully inserted in the cork, you press down on the levers and the cork comes out in one easy motion. Some double-lever corkscrews incorporate a bottle opener into the handle, making them ideal for picnics and tailgate parties. If you opt for a double lever corkscrew, be aware that some models are more ergonomically designed than others. Look especially at the handle — the part that you have to turn to insert the screw into the cork — to make sure it’s comfortable and wide enough to provide a good grip. Note, too, that some double lever models replace the time-honored helical screw with what appears to be a large wood screw, the kind you’d use to put together a deck or bookshelf. Avoid this type, as it’s more likely to bust up a cork that isn’t in perfect shape to begin with.

ScrewpullThe double lever would be the logical first choice were it not for the introduction, in the early 1980s of the Screwpull (shown with the company’s foil cutter). Deceptively simple, the Screwpull (now a division of Le Creuset) consists of a thin, extra-long Teflon-coated screw and a plastic frame that grips the bottle’s neck and centers the screw. You turn the handle until the screw is in the cork, and then, as you keep turning it, the cork ascends from the neck and winds up out of the bottle high on the screw, surrounded by the wider part of the frame. The original Screwpull is also available in a travel model. Its single removable lever is longer than the standard model’s twist handle, which reduces the effort needed to remove the cork.

Screwpull Activ-BallIf the original Screwpull has a drawback, it is that after several years of regular use the Teflon coating begins to wear. This can make it difficult to remove the cork from the screw. This problem has been addressed by the introduction of a new series that incorporates an automatic ejection technology called Activ-Ball. Like the original, the Activ-Ball version of the Screwpull is available in both tabletop and portable versions.

Within the context of conventional (i.e. you do the twisting) corkscrews, the Activ-Ball Screwpull is my first choice. This is not to say there isn’t an easier way to get the job done. Demonstrating that sometimes you do, indeed, get what you pay for, several manufacturers offer semi-automatic lever-action models that will remove a cork in roughly one second, with almost no effort at all.

RabbitlWith these models you swing a pair of clamps into position to hold the neck of the bottle, swing the lever in one direction to insert the screw, and then swing it back to remove the cork. Metrokane’s Rabbit (shown) and Le Creuset’s Screwpull Lever Model are two very popular models that have stood the test of time. In the absolute, you don’t need a corkscrew like this. The Activ-Ball Screwpull will get the job done with very little additional effort, and take just a few more seconds doing so. But if you consider the “wow” factor, one of these semi-automatics could be worth the extra dough.